Boys Who Cry? Pugad Lawin and the Start of the Revolution

Depiction of the Cry of Pugad Lawin (Sigaw ng Pugad Lawin)
Photo courtesy of GMA's video of Lupang Hinirang
It is said that "real men cry." Surely, scores of Katipunan (KKK) members who gathered one fateful day have the same idea. Since 1963, when President Diosdado Macapagal issued Proclamation Number 149, it has been widely accepted that August 23, 1896 is the date when the "Cry of Pugad Lawin" took place, a momentous event in Filipino history which is known for being the launching point of the Philippine Revolution. It may be comparable to Mexico's Cry of Dolores (September 16, 1810) and to Cuba's Cry of Yara (October 10, 1868). However, to this day, controversy and confusion has haunted the Cry of Pugad Lawin. There is even the notion that it did not happen at all! Is it possible that Filipinos have been remembering an event coming from the figment of imagination? This view has been forwarded as early as 1970 by historian Pedro Gagelonia.

Not long after the Philippine Revolution, the cry has been commemorated in Balintawak on August 26, the supposed date of the cry that was agreed upon at the time. This is shortly before a skirmish took place between Katipuneros and the Spanish guardia civil (Civil Guard), also dated to be on August 26, 1896 or later. The cry primarily involved the tearing of cedulas (tax certificates), and it is supposed to be symbolic of tearing away from the yoke of Spain. Examining Katipunan documents, taxes is one of the paramount issues leading to the Revolution. Still, what led to the confusion and the controversy? Is it possible today to resolve it, and how?

Pio Valenzuela
Photo courtesy of Wikipedia
Pugad Lawin Paradox
Imagine some event, maybe an outing or a party, that you and your friends went together in. Then, somehow, someway, the years pass by. Now, you disagree on the details of the event, perhaps even a few doubting it happened at all. Of course, this is putting the paradox in simple terms, but the situation is not as easy as it may look.

Dr. Pio Valenzuela is one of the surviving witnesses of the Cry of Pugad Lawin, and this is confirmed by the list drawn up by Guillermo Masangkay (who himself was present). If we are to believe Masangkay, Dr. Valenzuela would be the only doctor participating in the cry. However, it seems that his statements are not consistent. His first statement mentions a "Katipunan meeting" happening between August 23 and 25 at Balintawak. His second statement, made some 15 years later, mentions the cry to happen at the house of Apolonio Samson in Kangkong, south of Balintawak, on August 23. His third statement, made another six years later, tells of the cry occurring at the house of Melchora Aquino (also known as Tandang Sora) at Pacpac-Lawin (Pugad Lawin) near Pasong Tamo, also on August 23. Pugad Lawin is further north of Balintawak. His fourth statement, made before Masangkay and other surviving Katipunan members recalled the event, tells a meeting at Kangkong on August 22, but the cry occurred at the house of Juan Ramos (Melchora Aquino's son) at Pugad Lawin near Bahay Toro the day after, which is August 23. While Valenzuela seems to be firm on the date, August 23, he is apparently uncertain on where the cry actually occurred. As it is, Valenzuela is not known for having impeccable memory. This is demonstrated with his recollections of his meeting with Rizal at Dapitan, months before the launch of the Revolution. His confusing statements threw doubt to the cry itself. Did it really happen or not?

Pugad Lawin marker
Photo courtesy of Quezon City LGU
Bahay Toro, not Balintawak
In 1933 and 1935, Valenzuela was supported by fellow revolutionaries Cipriano Pacheco and Briccio Pantas in declaring that the cry occurred at the placed called "Pugad Lawin", not in Balintawak. They also confirm Valenzuela's statement that there was a meeting before the cry at Kangkong. Meanwhile, in 1940, the site of "Pugad Lawin" was identified as Sitio Gulod in Barrio Banlat, which is also believed to be the site of Melchora Aquino's house. Did Valenzuela believe that Juan Ramos and Melchora Aquino live in the same home? In 1964, the so-called "Minutes of the Katipunan" as released by the National Historical Institute (NHI) also refers to the cry happening on August 23. However, later research observes that the Minutes are "fake." This is a claim supported by the remaining veterans of the Revolution at the time of release. At any rate, the Minutes did not help. Sure, there must be a place called "Pugad Lawin," but to where it is located exactly is another question. Of course, after the formation of Quezon City in 1939, a large chunk of the Balintawak area was claimed. To this day, there are two Balintawaks, a fraction in Quezon City, and another fraction in Caloocan City. It would be the city's pride to have their place be the location of the famous cry.

The date also became a subject of debate when Masangkay gives two possible dates of the cry, August 24 and 26. This, and Julio Nakpil's mention of a primer grito (first cry) in 1925, seems to forward a new possibility: There might have been two Cries of Pugad Lawin. Another veteran, Santiago Alvarez, mentioned in his memoirs a cry at Bahay Toro, a place between Pasong Tamo and Kangkong, on August 24. Of course, to be fair, neither Nakpil (the husband of Gregoria de Jesus) nor Santiago Alvarez were included in Masangkay's list. However, they seem to support Masangkay's claim of a cry on August 24 and 26. Also, this also throws "Pugad Lawin" into doubt, since neither Masangkay nor Francisco Carreon (Macario Sakay's right hand man) remembers Pugad Lawin, but seems to recall Bahay Toro. For an event attended by more or less 1,000 members (Pacheco even remembers some 2,000 members attending), is it too difficult to correctly recall something so significant in our history? Does the confusion mean that there has not been a cry at all? Or does this only mean that our memory has been dulled throughout the years?

In the 1980s, the search for Pugad Lawin continued. This time, there seems to be stronger evidence of the cry happening at Pugad Lawin near Bahay Toro than at Pugad Lawin near Pasong Tamo. It is also concluded that it is the house of Juan Ramos in Bahay Toro, not in the house of Melchora Aquino in Pasong Tamo, where the cry happened. This is supported by the recollection of the descendants of Juan Ramos, who pointed out where his house is located. Thus, from August 23, 1984 to this day, the official marker for Pugad Lawin lies in Bahay Toro, which is now part of Quezon City. Nevertheless, even to this day, there is still the chance that the location of Pugad Lawin may be changed later on, provided new evidence surfaces in the future.

Two Cries of Pugad Lawin?
Manila Observatory
Photo courtesy of Ateneo de Manila University
Historian Teodoro Agoncillo, whose seminal work "The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan" (1956) helped organize Katipunan history as we know it today, had the privilege to interview both Masangkay and Valenzuela, among other surviving veterans of the Revolution. Seeing the similarities and the differences between the accounts of the Katipuneros, Agoncillo tried to find possible independent sources to validate their claims. For one, he consulted the Manila Observatory. This is to know which days from August 22 to 28 (just before the first battle at Pinaglabanan in San Juan) may fit the weather described by the existing accounts.

He came to the conclusion that only August 23 may be the viable date to do the cry, because the rest of the days considered are rainy days. It will prove difficult to assemble a thousand people at the yard of someone else's house, and then tear up cedulas into pieces. Agoncillo also notes that August 23 is a windy day. It will be easier for them to clean up, which may explain why Manuel Sityar, one of the guardia civil officers patrolling the area at the time, did not notice them. Agoncillo does not seem to agree to the current site recognized as Pugad Lawin at Bahay Toro. However, the marker he placed to denote the location of Pugad Lawin has disappeared. Despite the reputation of Agoncillo, other historians do not seem to share his ideas all of the time. The location of Pugad Lawin is case in point.

Nevertheless, to this day, there seemed to be supporters of the notion of "two cries." One of them would be Soledad Borromeo-Buehler, a descendant of Masangkay, in her book "The Cry of Balintawak: A Contrived Controversy" (1998). What supports this claim is the supposed meeting that took place before the cry, and the supposed battle that took place after the cry. It is forwarded that there were at least two meetings and two skirmishes prior to the Battle of Pinaglabanan on August 30. On August 24, there must have been a meeting at Kangkong, and on August 26, there must have been a meeting at Balintawak. In between, there is August 23, and August 25. There are two opportunities wherein the Katipunan may have gathered their forces. Consequently, there are two opportunities for the Katipunan to encounter Spanish forces, something that may be derived from the account of Manuel Ros, another guardia civil officer assigned to the area. This does seem to coincide with Masangkay's claim of two cries on August 24 and 26. At any rate, she concludes that the "Cry of Pugad Lawin" as we know today is a "hoax."

There also seems consensus among other Katipunan members who were absent from the cry that there must have been a momentous event on August 24. For instance, the Biak-na-Bato Constitution acknowledges that the Revolution began on August 24, and it was a document ratified by at least one of the Katipuneros who attended the cry, Cipriano Pacheco. The date was also agreed upon by Emilio Aguinaldo, who supposedly received the news about the decision to start the Revolution. Of course, just like Valenzuela, Aguinaldo may not be the most reliable source to consider. Historians Milagros Guerrero, Emmanuel Encarnacion, and Ramon Villegas also agree to August 24, even though they claim only a singular "Cry of Balintawak" which happened at the house of Melchora Aquino at Sitio Gulod in Barrio Banlat. It is now part of Quezon City.

Statues portraying the Cry of Pugad Lawin
Photo courtesy of Wikipedia
However, the question of where the cry happened will float again. Did the two cries happen at Pugad Lawin? Or is Pugad Lawin some code name for a set location to congregate? If it happened in different places, does that explain why there are two Pugad Lawins as well, one near Pasong Tamo and one near Bahay Toro? Or perhaps, as old maps confirm, Pugad Lawin is not a real place at all? in this case, it might be better to revert to "Cry of Balintawak." Where there two cedulas to tear with in the first place, or there were two groups of people who chose to tear their cedulas? Speaking of groups of people, it is interesting to see who attended the said event, at least according to Masangkay's list:

  1. Melecia Ruestra
  2. Pastor Santos
  3. Salustiano Cruz
  4. Procopio Bonifacio
  5. Juan de la Cruz
  6. Emilio Jacinto
  7. Andres Bonifacio
  8. Pio Valenzuela
  9. Vicente Leyva
  10. Ramon Bernardo
  11. Geronimo Medina y Cristobal
  12. Vicente Molina
  13. Miguel Resurreccion
  14. Patricio Belen
  15. Crispulo Chacon
  16. Lorenzo Martinez
  17. Tomas Villanueva
  18. Pio Santos
  19. Tomas Alegre
  20. Roman Ramos
  21. Tito Miguel
  22. Aguedo del Rosario
  23. Apolonio Cruz
  24. Alejandro Santiago
  25. Deogracias Fajardo
  26. Juan Fajardo
  27. Rogelio Borja
  28. Isaac del Carmen
  29. Hilario Sayo
  30. Cipriano Pacheco
  31. Teodoro Plata
  32. Jose Trinidad
  33. Hermogenes Plata
  34. Tomas Remigio
  35. Pantaleon Torres
  36. Enrique Pacheco
  37. Faustino Manalac
  38. Cosme Taguyod
  39. Rafael Gutierrez
  40. Guillermo Masangkay (himself)
  41. Pedro Zabala
  42. Briccio Pantas
  43. Estanislao Vargas
  44. Apolonio Samson
  45. Julio Navarro
  46. Alejandro Andaya
  47. Marcelo Badell
  48. Macario Sakay
  49. Nicomedes Carreon
  50. Francisco Carreon
  51. Sarhento Marcelo
  52. Valentin Lagasca
  53. Eugenio Santos
  54. Calixto Santiago
  55. Restituto Javier
  56. Hermenegildo Reyes
Is it possible that the reader found a possible family ancestor? Anyway, would have it been easier to know if the rest of the attendees, say Emilio Jacinto or Andres Bonifacio, can clear up the confusion? At the least, there may be a consensus that the week leading to the first battle of the Revolution is eventful.

Significance of boys who cry today
What is so special to a thousand discontented people tearing their tax certificates? We see rallies and demonstrations like that almost every week. Is there significance for the boys who cry today? The day we commemorate our national heroes (fourth Monday of August) is derived from the day the Katipunan tear apart their cedulas, and declared a war of independence. To this day, it is even contended that this must be the proper "Independence Day" of the Philippines, noting that the cry followed an organization of a national government. However, there are also people who view the cry like a widely accepted event like Christmas (birth of Jesus) or Good Friday (death of Jesus) in the sense that the exact date is not important. What is significant is what the event means for all. As for the Cry of Pugad Lawin, it is the culmination of the Revolution which gave birth to our nation. Besides, this is one aspect of history which makes it exciting. It is not confined to absolute conclusions and definitions. Indeed, there is more for the future generations to study about.


Comments

  1. Descendant of Emilio Jacinto have written text about this that was uncovered by the family... It is interesting to note that although this happens in Kalookan, in poblacion where it started, there was no mention of prominent people in Kalookan that are members of the katipunan...

    ReplyDelete
  2. HINDI NAGPUNIT ng CEDULA ang Supremo at kanyang mga BFF's! Pugad Lawin, Balintawak, Pasong Tamo, Bahay Toro etc. etc. etc.

    Maraming conflicting reports kung saan naganap ang Unang Sigaw. Hindi malaman ng mga historiador kung sa Pugad Lawin, Balintawak, Pasong Tamo, Bahay Toro etc. Ang totoo niyan kung susuriin mong mabuti sa lahat ng lugar na yan naganap ang sinasabing Unang Sigaw. At ang Supremo ay nagdadala ng kopya ng CEDULA niya na pupunitin sa mga meeting para himukin ang mga pobre na punitin din nila ang kanilang mga cedula.

    Isang patunay na hindi nagpunit ng tunay na CEDULA ang Supremo ay ang pagkakaroon pa rin ni Dr Pio Valenzuela ng intact na CEDULA. Matapos ang failed uprising at San Juan debacle, sumuko si Pio Valenzuela sa mga Kastila at pinakita niya pa ang kanyang intact at buong CEDULA. Kung hindi nagpunit ng CEDULA si Valenzuela at katabi siya ni Bonifacio sa grand pagpupunit ng CEDULA event, hindi ba dapat sinita yan ni Bonifacio at "pinaghiwalay ang ulo sa balikat?" The fact na hindi nagpunit ng CEDULA si Valenzuela, na isa sa mga mataas na opisyales ng Katipunan, ay nagpapatunay na si Bonifacio ay hindi rin nagpunit ng CEDULA. Sila na mga opisyales ng Katipunan ay nag collude para utuin ang mga pobreng magsasaka.

    Huwag din natin kalimutan na si Bonifacio ay part time actor na nag appear sa mga moro-moro plays bago naging Freemason. Kaya kaya niyang maging convincing na nagpupunit ng totoong CEDULA for the first time para sa mga walang kaalam-alam.

    Source:
    Dr Pio Valenzuela and the Katipunan

    credit : TheClockworks Napakalaking ngengot! BWAHAHAHAHAH ⬇️ https://youtu.be/La0Rb53Ujng

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ako si Severino C. Samonte, ng Novaliches. Sa aking palagay, ang walang katapusang pagtatalo tungkol sa iba't-ibang pangalan ng pook kung saan nangyari ang Unang Sigaw ng Himagsikan noong 1896 ay dahil sa pag-aalis ng dating bayan ng Novaliches buhat sa mapa ng Rizal province noong 1903. Subukin ninyong ibalik pansamantala ang dating mapa ng Novaliches, alisin muna ang Quezon City, at dito ay makikita na ang Balintawak, Kangkong, Banlat, Pasong Tamo, at Bahay Toro ay dating bahagi ng Novaliches town.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Valenzuela's statement confirms a meeting at Kangkong, while 1940's "Pugad Lawin" site in Barrio Banlat is believed to be Melchora Aquino's house. 1964's "Minutes of the Katipunan" references the August 23 cry.

    Please visit Do You Want To Be Healed

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular History